Understanding Intellectual Property Rights

Understanding Intellectual Property Rights

By Jashaswee Mishra (Project Assistant – CLAT EASY)

Intellectual Property is, in a simplistic way, the development of the intellect or the intelligence of the mind of man. It refers to academic creativity and creativity in the cultural, scientific, and artistic sectors. Attempts are being created by countries around the world to safeguard proprietary information. One big explanation is to recognise the economic interests of the producers of this intellectual propulsion by means of a law. Another explanation is the need to cultivate innovation among the people, which would, in the long term, lead to a world containing only fair-trade practices.

 Intellectual Property Legislation is intended to protect those who produce and control patented goods and services by supplying them with time-limited rights to govern the use of those commodities. These rights do not apply to the particular organization in which the development takes place, may be manifested, but rather to the intellectual work as well, the mental product.


  1. Patent – A patent is a type of property that has an intangible meaning attached to it. It is a proprietary right given to an inventor which is a commodity that is the consequence of a particular ability to do something or provides a new technical approach to a problem”. To secure a patent, the technical details must be revealed to the public in a patent application. This after validation, remains valid for the next twenty years. 
  2. “Trademark -The trademark is another traditional type of intellectual property. Trademark is an emblem capable of distinguishing between both the goods and services from one business and another. This is simply a way of preserving the distinctive identities of renowned brands”. It allows the consumer to identify the brand or the product automatically without being manipulated. The logos or slogans used will be an example of a trademark.
  3. “Copyright is accessible to literary, theatrical, musical, visual, filmmaker, or sound recording makers. It shall decide when and under what circumstances the subject matter can be used by individuals other than the owner of a specific” intellectual property. About any good is patented. These include the obvious icons on the food box and on the name, etc.
  4. Geographical indicator – geographical indicator tag is an identifier used for products of a particular geographical origin that possess qualities that occur based on their fundamental origin. The sign must mark the origin of the product and nature, features, or prestige should be decided by the place of origin. 
  5. Industrial design-Industrial architecture concerns goods that are part of an industrial establishment. It defines the form, arrangement, color, or design that may be ingeniously carved or recreational in nature of the object. The owners of an approved industrial design shall have the authority to prohibit foreign entities from manufacturing, selling, or importing articles representing a design that is an imitation of the design.
  6. Trade secret – Trade confidentiality, in simpler words, means a policy followed by the owner of the company. It can be some proprietary commercial knowledge that provides a company with a full lead in the global market for the commodity involved. An investor’s initial move is a trade secret. The concept or formula behind the unique market opportunity must stay confidential.

It is now clear that the definition of intellectual property is one that encompasses a broad variety of intangible property rights within its framework. Any commodity that is part of world market encompasses one or perhaps more forms of intellectual property rights.

It is also apparent that only a limited amount of information is required. Describing the right to tangible property into thought. And there is a much broader spectrum of knowledge to be addressed when it comes to Land as well, which is not noticeable or tangible. And the need for imagination to envisage the existence of a mental commodity and a greater level of constructive ingenuity.  

The legislative, administrative provisions are well defined, and the regulatory system for the defence of Intellectual Property Rights in India.  It is important to note here that India has fulfilled its commitments under the “Trade-related Intellectual Property Rights (‘TRIPS’)” by instituting the required statutes and the amendment of the existing provisions.


(a) There have been a variety of factors leading to the processing of these clauses. “The Exchange and Trade Marks Act, 1958 (‘TM Act, 1958’) was replaced by the Trade Marks Act, 1999”.

(b) The Copyright Act, 1957 has been updated to Protect Technology Systems as ‘literary work;’ the Patent Act, 1970 has been expanded by the Statutes of 1999 and 2002 and 2005.

c) “The Designs Act of 1911 was fully revised and a new institution was created, the Designs Act of 2000”.

The aforementioned legislation has been passed in order to secure newly acknowledged categories of intellectual property India: 

■ “The Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and protection) Act, 1999”. 

■ “The Semiconductor Integrated Circuits Layout Design Act, 2000”.

■ “The Protection of Plants & Varieties and Farmers Rights Act, 2001”. 

■ “The Biological Diversity Act, 2002”.


Underneath the trade-mark act, the word ‘mark’ is defined as being ‘a tool, logo, header, name, price tag, call, signature, expression, text, number, packaging or combination of colours, or any aggregate thereof.’ For this reason, the list of occasions of the trade-mark is comprehensive and not extensive. Any trademark that is ‘graphically depicted’ and a sign of a trade link with the owner is entitled to be licensed as a trade mark under the trade mark act. This perception opens the field of trademark security to unusual emblems such as sound marks furnished with ‘graphic representation’ The best manner in which the trademark can be described within the scope of the trademark usefulness. But The trade-mark act or the policies framed thereunder do not contemplate the shape of submission of facts of the “Unconventional logos Trademark laws describe “graphic representation” as a reflection of a trade mark for products or goods”. Sound labels, then can be depicted on paper and in descriptive form. Reduction of a sensory mark to a textual explanation. It will not always be feasible on paper.

 “Graphical definition of a sound mark should be clearly defined. The exact tone, the compliance of the same, that will lead to realistic problems, E.g., the outcome of the quest of the trade mark at the Trade Mark Register, not to be correct if the symbol is not sufficient”. 

The registration of a trade mark shall be given to the registered party. Proprietor with the sole right to use the trademark in relation to the products or services for which it is intended is enrolled and is required to seek relief with respect to breach of the same thing. Registration shall serve as a Public alert to others, reminding them of the fact that they are authorized trademarks and cannot be replicated under any circumstances.


“Under Indian law, authentication is not a requirement for acquiring copyright in a project. The ownership of the art is generated while the drawings are designed and assigned the shape of the cloth, provided that it is authentic. The Copyright Act provides for a system for the registration of copyright. However, unlike the U.S. Law, the certification of Indian laws does not grant any exclusive protections or benefits that are known as such”. The copyright review shall serve as prima facie evidence of the information entered therein. The files endeavouring to be copies of the registrations and excerpts of the sign in approved with the assistance of the Registrar of Copyright are enforceable in testimony in all courts without verification of validity in the same manner. A copyright grants protection to the creator and his representatives for the works and stops such works from being copied or reproduced without his/their consent. 

The modification has brought massive monetary rights for authors of literary, musical works and many others. which can be included in cinematograph films and sound recordings. Authors of literary or musical works 

  1. “incorporated in movies; or
  2.  sound recordings (which are not a part of films)

 have the right to receive royalties identical to the royalties received by way of the assignee of such rights for exploitation of their works A copyright is infringed if someone without a suitable license does something that the owner of the copyright has a different proper to do. but there are certain exceptions to the above rule” (e.g., truthful dealing). The Copyright Act includes redress for infringements of copyright in both legal and crook terminology. Where a violation is created, the copyright owner is entitled to redress the infringement by means of indictment, compensation and warrant for the capture and demolition of infringing articles.


In India, the patent law is the “Patents Act, 1970, since 1995, the Indian Patents (Amendment) Act, 1999 (‘First Amendment’), the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002 (‘Second Amendment’) and the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005 (‘Third Amendment’), before the Third Amendment, the President of India promulgated the Patents (Amendment) Ordinance, 2004 (‘Ordinance) The provisions of the law are based on the Patents Code, 2003 (‘Rules’)”.

Section 3 of the Patents Act points out inventions that are not called “innovations” 

They may come under the scope of the term “invention” but are specifically removed from the definition by the Patents Act. Improvements that are not innovations inside the that means of the Patents Act, and accordingly are not patentable in India, consist of:

  1. farming or food science techniques;
  2.  a scheme for the therapeutic or different care of humans and animals
  3.  an inconsequential finding of certain new possessions or new uses for a specific compound.

In spite of the patenting of the commodity regime, this clause would become more relevant Bolar’s Provision helps producers to begin. The method of research and development in time to ensure Affordable comparable generic drugs should be used Brought on the market shortly after the expiry of the patent on the product.


  • Wrongful acts;
  • Harm or injury or discomfort or inconvenience caused to another human. Inconsistency or inconvenience to be deemed must be more than sheer delicacy or haste and more than delicate adverse implications or dissatisfaction. Such irritation or grief or nuisance ought to be such which the law considers as sizable or cloth.
  • Non- Public disturbance is an illegitimate intrusion and/or interference that, in recognition of the benefit of the property, damages the occupant or operator of the land.

For this reason the factors of personal nuisance are

1. Unjustified or illegitimate interference;

2. Such conflict shall be with the use as well as possession of the land, or a few privileges over or in conjunction with the property;

3.Nuisance may be valued for money or for immediate emotional sorrow.

In “St. Helen Smelting Co. v. Tipping”, Smoke from the defendant’s manufacturing work destroyed the plaintiff’s shrubs and trees. The court ruled that certain injuries, which represented harm to land, had given rise to a cause of injury.

In “Ram Raj Singh v. Babulal, The appellant, a medical practitioner, alleged that a sufficient amount of dust generated with the assistance of the defendant’s brick powder mill” had invaded the sitting room, causing irritation and nuisance to the plaintiff and his patients.

The tribunal held that once a sufficient quantity of soil from a brick powder mill set up near the doctor’s consultation room had been attached to that room and the obvious thin red coating on clothes had occurred and, in particular, that the dust was a public danger bound to damage the welfare of the individual, it was evident that the practitioner had proven to be peculiar to himself. This means that he has proven unique harm.

In “Hollywood Silver Fox Farm Ltd v Emmett”, A was in the practice of fostering silver foxes on his estate. Throughout the mating season, the wanderers are very nervous and reliable whenever they are upset, either to fail to propagate or to abort or to kill their young. B, an adjoining landowner, mischievously stimulated his son to unleash arms on his own land as near as possible to the mating pens for the traumatic A’s vixens. A filed a safe injunction against B and made it into a smash.

In “Dilaware Ltd. v. Westminister metropolis Council, the respondent became the beneficiary of a tree rising in the footpath of the dual motorway”. The roots of the tree brought cracks to the house of the neighbour. The offeree of the construction of the building, once the cracks had been found, was given the right to retrieve fair restorative expense in view of the complete harm incurred by the continued nuisance caused by the construction.

In case of bodily pain there are vital conditions to be fulfilled:

a. In extra of the natural and regular course of entertainment of the belongings which will be capable of deliver an movement for nuisance to property the individual injured have to have both a proprietary or possessory hobby in the premises laid low with the nuisance.

b. Materially interfering with the everyday consolation of human life

The pain ought to be which includes an ordinary or average man or woman in the locality and environment might now not placed up with or tolerate.

In “Broadbent v. Imperial gasoline Co, An injunction shall be issued to prohibit a gas firm from processing fuel in such close vicinity” to the property of the complainant, a market gardener, and in one of those ways that it may damage its lawn output by drifting away from putrid memory.

In “Shots Iron Co. v. Inglis, An injunction was given to prohibit a corporation from engaging in calcining activities in any manner in which noxious vapours might be emitted to the pursuer’s land in order to be able to inflict harm to its estates or goods”.

In “Sanders Clark v. Grosvenor mansions Co. An injunction has been issued to save a person from converting the floor below a residential flat into a dining place and thus creating a disturbance by using warmth and sent to the occupant of the flat”.

In “Datta Mal Chiranji Lal v. Lodh Prasad, The defendant installed an electrically operated flour mill adjacent to the plaintiff’s house in the bazaar district, and while the mill was operating, it created such turbulence that the plaintiff and his own family did not experience liberty and tranquillity from disruption all day long in order to comply with their daily appeals”. They did not have a quiet relaxation at night time also. It turned into held that the jogging of the mill amounted to a personal nuisance which have to now not be approved.

In “Palmar v. Loder, In this case, a permanent injunction was given to the defendant to prohibit him from interference with the plaintiff’s possession of his flat by yelling, knocking, squeezing, ringing doorbells or”, in some other case, serving as a cause for disturbance by noise.

In “Radhey Shiam v. Gur Prasad Sharma, It has changed into held by the Allahabad High Court Charge sheet that an eternal injunction can be given to the defendant if, in a hazardous environment”. There may be substantial adds to the disruption by the introduction of flour mills which materially affect the physical comfort of the complainant.


It’s miles a legitimate defence to an movement for nuisance that the stated nuisance is below the terms of a grant.


A name acquired by means of usage and time, and permitted by law; as if a man claims some feature, unless he, his parents, or those whose estate he has, have had possession of it for the duration specified by regulation. That’s right there in section 26, obstacle Act & section 15 Easements Act.

Three things are vital to establish a proper through prescription:

1. Usage and occupation or leisure;

2. The identification of the feature enjoyed;

3. That it ought to be unfavourable to the interests of a few particular men or women.

A specialized defence, applicable in the event of nuisance, is a prescription if it has been quiet and freely loved as a serfdom and properly disturbed for twenty years. After 20 years of continuous life of a nuisance, the prescriptive right to keep the miles gained as an easement to the property on which it resides was to be retained. At the end of this period, the nuisance becomes legalized ab initio, as if it had been approved in its graduation with the aid of a provide from the owner of servient land. The time runs, not from the day whilst the cause of the nuisance started out however from the day while the nuisance began.

The easement can be obtained handiest in opposition to unique belongings, no longer against the entire international.


The treatments to be had for nuisance are as follows:

· Injunction-This may be a provisional injunction which has been issued in the interim and which may have been revoked or demonstrated. If it is seen, it takes the form of an eternal injunction. However, the issuance of an injunction is once again a matter for the seat of the arbitration.

· Damages-The injuries granted to the offended person shall be financial damages, i.e., damages simply in order to understand that, legally, any damages have been made to the plaintiff or contractual damages, i.e. that the cost of the damage is determined by the legislation and no longer weighs heavily on damages incurred by the plaintiff or punitive damages.

· Abetement-Summary treatment or termination of nuisance by the affected person without appeal to criminal court cases. It’s not necessarily a provision that the statute favours, and it’s not generally very helpful. 

In the case of non – compliance of the Indian patent. The patentee may record a document of form in the best court of law, which may be a district court or a high court. In the event that a patent infringement suit is brought to the trial court and the argument is filed by the claimant, the patent infringement suit is referred to the High Court. Under the nature of the violation, the claimant can request an injunction and damages or order a benefit account from the patent infringer’s capacity. If the claimant proves that, by the time of the violation, he is no longer aware of the significance of the patent and has no fair basis to agree that the patent exists, an injunction for penalties or defaults for income is not issued. therefore, the patentee ought to take steps to carry to most of the people that his product or procedure is patented. In the case of a violation, unauthorized goods, chemicals and gadgets used for its production may be confiscated, relinquished or discarded. The courts may use suo motu, or the technology of a qualified entity, clinical counsellors to assist the courtroom or to publish a report on an identifiable inquiry. The Patents Act does not provide for crook movement in case of patent infringement.


The rule of nuisance is a kind of unalterable law. Yet it has evolved and escalated by perception and a multitude of decisions. The definition of infringement is one that generally occurs as a pinnacle of the day-to-day life of a man and the judgment on the analogous needs to be made on a case-by-case basis to guarantee that neither indignant complainant is recovered uncompensated nor the claimant is remunerated. In the matter of nuisance, the Indian Courts have rulings of the non-unusual regulation machine, along with the creation of their own precedents. This has contributed to the creation of a proper legal machine that guarantees the justice and well-being of both parties and society at large.

It changed into held that he had now not, because the person became now not bodily able to Prevention by the owner of the underlying condition, and became unworkable before the date when, by reason of the rapid vicinity, it became an annoyance in statute, and in such conditions, since the latter had no protective electricity, there was no prescription by the means of the approval or confidentiality of the owner of the underlying condition.

The results of the human mind that involve the topic of licensed innovation are commonly portrayed as non-rivalrous public products. Basically, this implies that a similar item might be utilized at the same time by more than one individual without reducing the accessibility of that item for use by others.

The law of protected innovation can be viewed as similar to the law of substantial property in that both comprise a heap of rights presented upon the land owner. Notwithstanding, the law of protected innovation is isolated and unmistakable from the law of substantial property. Where the privilege of selective belonging is at the centre of the heap of rights securing genuine and individual property, land and assets, the equivalent cannot be said of licensed innovation. The law of protected innovation is generally perceived as giving an impetus to creators and innovators to deliver works to assist general society by directing the public’s utilization of such works to guarantee that creators and designers are made up for their endeavours.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *