![D.P Choudhary & Ors. v. Kumari Manjulata [AIR 1997, Raj 170]](https://i0.wp.com/llbmania.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/0001-17536494428_20210227_201501_0000.png?fit=1170%2C658&ssl=1)
D.P Choudhary & Ors. v. Kumari Manjulata [AIR 1997, Raj 170]
By Divyashree & Ashlesha (Team LL.B Mania) Defendant Appellant – D.P. Choudhary And Ors. Plaintiff Respondent – Kumari Manjulata Facts Kumari Manjulata was aged about
![Bhim Singh v. State of Jammu & Kashmir [AIR 1986 SC 494]](https://i0.wp.com/llbmania.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/0001-17535753663_20210227_195122_0000.png?fit=1170%2C658&ssl=1)
Bhim Singh v. State of Jammu & Kashmir [AIR 1986 SC 494]
By Charisma & Nimisha (Team LL.B Mania) Facts Bhim Singh was an MLA in Jammu and Kashmir Legislative Assembly. He was arrested and detained by
Social Status of Tribal Women in India
By Shikha Mishra, Modi Law College Introduction India may be a very interesting country to review the meaning of diversity because this can be one
Death Penalty and Human Rights
By Shikha Mishra (Modi Law College, LL.B 3rd Year) Death penalty could be a lawsuit during which someone is executed in accordance with against
Crime Against Women
by Manvee & Rajanish Kumar Abstract In this Long article titled “Crime Against Women” a brief introduction regarding the topic has been provided and after
Marriage in Shia & Sunni Law- An Basic Outline
By Joysree Das INTRODUCTION There are two main schools of Muslim law, namely- Sunnis and Shias. Both are further divided into number of schools but
![Nilabati Behera Alias Lalita v. S/O Orissa & Ors. [AIR 1993, SC 1960]](https://i0.wp.com/llbmania.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/img-20210319-wa0000.jpg?fit=1170%2C658&ssl=1)
Nilabati Behera Alias Lalita v. S/O Orissa & Ors. [AIR 1993, SC 1960]
By Shivi Khare Petitioner: Nilabati Behera or Lalitha Behera Respondent: State of Orissa FACTS: Petitioner’s son suman Behera aged 22 years was taken into the
Union Carbide Corp. v. Union of India
By Shivi Khare THIS CASE IS POPULARLY KNOWN AS THE BHOPAL GAS TRAGEDY CASE Petitioner: Union Carbide Corporation Limited Respondent: Union of India BRIEF SUMMARY
Vishaka & Ors v. State Of Rajasthan
AIR 1997 SC 3011: 1997 (5) SCALE 453: 1997 (6) SCC 241: (1997) Supp. 3 SCR 404 By- Joysree, Manvee, K.A Nithin Kishore, P. Nithin
![Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India [AIR 1978]](https://i0.wp.com/llbmania.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/img-20210319-wa0005-1.jpg?fit=1170%2C658&ssl=1)
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India [AIR 1978]
By- P. Nithin Pramod Kumar, K.A Nithin Kishore, Joysree Das, Manvee Facts The petitioner’s passport dated June 1,1976 having been confiscated “in the public interest”